The Court in Pilsen confirms the inadmissibility of Paraskevich's extradition
On 2 January, 2013, the Regional Court in Pilsen upheld its decision of 5 October, 2012, considering the extradition of Tatiana Paraskevich as inadmissible. The decision was justified by the practice of violations of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights by Ukrainian courts and law enforcement agencies, with particular regard to Article 3 of the Convention on the prohibition of torture and Article 6 on the right to a fair trial.
More about
-
22INTERPOL's reform and rights of victims of politically motivated extradition requests: steps forward and emergence of new threats
sep -
03Stop the extradition of the oppositionist due to the threats of torture, an unfair trial and the illegal interference of Kazakhstan
jun -
07The list of Kazakh dissidents, their families and colleagues persecuted with the use of INTERPOL in the European Union in 2012-15
apr -
21Alexander Pavlov was on the verge of freedom
jul -
17Polish Parliamentarians’ Appeal to Ukraine’s Authorities
jun
Related galleries
Related Publications
- Ukraine assists post-Soviet states with the persecution of political opponents and refugees (.pdf, 12.69 MB)
- The case of Tatiana Paraskevich: Through misuse of the EU's justice system, Kazakhstan's lobbyists seek to have Paraskevich's asylum status revoked (.pdf, 0.32 MB)
- The Open Dialog Foundation welcomes Lithuania’s decision to deny the extradition of Syrym Shalabayev to Kazakhstan or Ukraine (.pdf, 0.33 MB)
- The case of Paraskevich: Ukraine continues to collaborate with Russia and Kazakhstan on attempts to prosecute political refugees (.pdf, 0.14 MB)
- Report: The facts which confirm the fabrication of the case of Mukhtar Ablyazov in Russia: Tatiana Paraskevich and Artur Trofimov prosecution (.pdf, 0.47 MB)
