Mukhtar Ablyazov's lawyers statement
© mukhtarablyazov.org 14.03.2014

AIX-EN-PROVENCE PROSECUTOR AND COURT ADMIT ERRORS IN ABLYAZOV EXTRADITION DECISIONS; NOW TRYING TO INTERFERE IN PROCEEDINGS AT CASSATION COURT IN PARIS
DEFENSE BLASTS ATTEMPT TO PREVENT ABLYAZOV WIN AT CASSATION COURT;
SAYS PROSECUTOR SERVING CORRUPT REGIMES OF KAZAKHSTAN, RUSSIA AND UKRAINE;
DENOUNCES AIX-EN-PROVENCE COURT’S NONCHALANCE ABOUT CERTITUDE OF UNFAIR TRIAL AND TORTURE IF ABLYAZOV EXTRADITED

Aix-en-Provence, March 13, 2014 — Aix-en-Provence prosecutor Solange Legras and the Court of Appeal of Aix-en-Provence have admitted that errors undermine the twin court decisions of January 9, 2014 that approved the extradition of Kazakh political opponent and former BTA Bank chairman Mukhtar Ablyazov.

The Aix-en-Provence court had responded favorably to extradition requests from Russia and Ukraine, giving priority to the Russian request. Even though Ablyazov’s case is now at the Cassation Court in Paris, Legras asked that a new hearing be held on February 27, 2014 at the court in Aix-en-Provence, at which she asked the court to correct the errors. On March 13, 2014, the court in Aix-en-Provence ruled to agree with her request.

Ablyazov’s defense had asserted that the Aix-en-Provence court should reject the prosecutor’s request to amend the decisions. They called the prosecutor’s maneuver “ungrounded and completely unprecedented in French law”. They warned the judges not to appear to be acting collusively with the prosecutor to correct the flaws, which would be an illegal way of trying to ensure their decision to extradite Ablyazov withstands the scrutiny of the Cassation Court.

Learning of this latest twist in his case, Ablyazov declared: “The Aix-en-Provence prosecutor’s tardy move to correct the errors of the local court is an attempt to prevent the Cassation Court in Paris from quashing the decisions against me.” 

Ablyazov further noted: “I am shocked that the prosecutor and the court in Aix-en-Provence are so willing to believe allegations coming from regimes that put bullets in the backs of protesters and illegally seize private businesses. I am even more shocked that whatever they think of the allegations, the prosecutor and the court in Aix-en-Provence pretend that I could ever have a fair trial in Russia or Ukraine, or avoid being tortured or killed if extradited.”

The flaws involve changes in the members of the three-judge panels in Aix-en-Provence that participated in the extradition hearing and that delivered the decisions on the politically sensitive case. The court was suspiciously silent on which judges actually deliberated on each of the two decisions. Under French law the judges who participated in a hearing must be the ones who deliberate on a decision. The prosecutor asked the court to reconvene even though the case is under the control of the Cassation Court in Paris, and went so far as to suggest specific wording to amend both decisions to add the names of the judges that the prosecutor assumes actually participated in the deliberations.

Ablyazov’s defense strenuously objected to the prosecutor’s attempt to short-circuit a possible quashing of the extradition decisions by the Cassation Court. The defense affirms that the lack of clarity over which judges deliberated is an important issue, and the omission of this information is only one of numerous errors made by the Aix-en-Provence court.

The defense admonished the local prosecutor for “slavishly serving the corrupt regimes of Kazakhstan, Russia and Ukraine” seeking Ablyazov’s extradition, declaring that she “lacks objectivity” on the case and has “brought shame to the French justice system and the French values she is supposed to uphold”. The lawyers emphasized that the allegations the trio of ex-Soviet countries are making against Ablyazov all flow from the unlawful and violent 2009 nationalization of BTA Bank by the notoriously corrupt Kazakh regime. The nationalization sought to eliminate Ablyazov’s power base as the leading opponent of the regime, and to prevent Ablyazov from triggering a contagion of political opposition in former Soviet countries. 

Legras ordered Ablyazov’s arrest in the south of France in July 2013. Lawyers serving the interests of Kazakh dictator Nursultan Nazarbayev asked her to arrest Ablyazov after their private detectives located him in France. Legras worked with Kazakhstan’s lawyers, ordering Ablyazov’s arrest on the basis of an Interpol notice posted by Ukraine in 2011. She later worked closely with French lawyers appointed by the corrupt and murderous Ukrainian regime to mount a case against Ablyazov that sought to whitewash Kazakhstan’s brutal and illegal nationalization of BTA Bank in 2009. The nationalization of BTA Bank inflicted grave human rights abuses on scores of people and their families, with innocents rounded up, tortured and jailed.

NEWS

Country Austria Belgium Czech Republic France Germany Italy Kazakhstan Poland Russia Spain Ukraine Topic Ablyazov Aix-en-Provence Aleksander Kwaśniewski Alexander Pavlov Alga! Aliyia Turusbekova Alma Shalabayeva Alua Ablyazova amnesty Amnesty International Ana Maria Gomes Angelino Alfano Antonin Lévy Astana asylum Audiencia Nacional Bill Browder Bolat Atabayev BTA Bank Bundestag Cassation Court Catherine Ashton Christiane Taubira Corbas Danielle Auroi Decembrists Democratic Choice of Kazakhstan Denis Grunis deportation economy EEAS Elena Valenciano Elisabeth Guigou Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement EU-Kazakhstan European Commission European Union extradition Federica Mogherini Fernando Maura Barandiaran Filippo Grandi Five Star Movement France Francois Hollande Frank Schwabe freedom of speech Garry Kasparov Home Office HRW human rights i-link Ignacio Sánchez Amor ill-treatment Ilyas Khrapunov Ilyashev & Partners international protection Interpol Iogan Merkel Irene Lozano ITAR-TASS Jacek Saryusz-Wolski Jaromír Štětina Jean-Claude Juncker Kazakhgate Kazakhstan Kazakhstan’s Prosecutor’s General Office Kazaword Kazimierz Michał Ujazdowski Kozlovska Kramek Laurent Fabius Lev Ponomarov Libero llyashev & Partners Lyon Lyudmyla Kozlovska Madina Ablyazova Mady Delvaux-Stehres Manuel Valls Manuela Serra Marcin Święcicki Marju Lauristin Mark Feygin Matteo Renzi Maurizio Improta Mediapart Michał Boni Ministry of Foreign Affairs Mukhtar Ablyazov Muratbek Ketebayev Nail Malyutin National Preventive Mechanism Nazarbayev Niccolo Rinaldi Nicolas Sarkozy non-refoulement principle Nursultan Nazarbayev Open Dialog PACE Pavel Svoboda Pavel Zabelin Peter Sahlas political asylum political persecution political prisoner prison privatization Process Rakhat Aliyev Ramazan Yesergepov rankings Red Alert Red Notice refugee status refugees release on parole repressions Russia Russian Federation Samruk-Kazyna Santer Sergey Duvanov Serhiy Khodakivskiy Solange Legras sources Spain Squarcini Statement Succession Sylvie Guillaume Syrym Shalabayev Tatiana Paraskevich the General Prosecutor’s Office of Ukraine Thun Tomáš Zdechovský Tomasz Makowski Tony Blair torture trial Trofimov Tunne Kelam Ukraine unfair trial UNHCR United Nations Urko Aiartza Viktor Shokin Vitaliy Kasko Viviane Reding Vladimir Guzyr Vladimir Kozlov Warrant Yehor Sobolev Yevgeniy Zhovtis Yukos Zhanaozen Zinaida Mukhortova
  • World reacts